WardsANC 8DA 1darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward · Dashed: 2016 Ward 1 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

10 of 18 seats

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 54.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

MantsopaAll 39 voting districts in

All 9 wards complete

Turnout50.3%

Voters on the roll30 401

South Africa · Counting23 645 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)

checked 22:58Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 14 928 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress8 06154.0%
DADemocratic Alliance4 00226.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 0737.2%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3042.0%
SACPSouth African Communist Party2551.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance1951.3%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation1951.3%
COPECongress of the People1711.1%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1210.8%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization890.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress670.4%
ActionSA660.4%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress640.4%
ACMAfrican Content Movement570.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement470.3%
UATUnited Africans Transformation340.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party310.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement200.1%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress120.1%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum90.1%
SDPService Delivery Party80.1%
APEMOAfrican People's Movement70.0%
SSDFSetsoto Service Delivery Forum70.0%
EKHETHUEkhethu Peoples Party70.0%
CFACommunity First Alliance60.0%
AULAAll Unemployment Labour Alliance40.0%
AASDAfrikan Alliance of Social Democrats40.0%
DPSADikwankwetla Party of South Africa30.0%
MAP16Mapsixteen Civic Movement30.0%
BCMTBaahi Civic Movement30.0%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party20.0%
Nketoane Community MovementNketoane Community Movement10.0%

Council seats · 18 ?

African National Congress8 ward · 2 PR10
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 4 PR5
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Mantsopa ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power37hours off5 outages

Water10hours off1 outage

Internet0hours offNo outages

2016 Ward 1, Mantsopa in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

MantsopaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 251 · All 39 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 39 voting districts here (15 289 of 30 401). The IEC publishes 50.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 561 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 574 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1042); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 535 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2087: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 10:05 SAST.