WardsANC 9darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward · Dashed: 2000 Ward 6 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 9 of 18 seats · 10 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 48.1%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

NketoanaAll 52 voting districts in

All 9 wards complete

Turnout51.0%

Voters on the roll32 883

South Africa · Counting23 652 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)

checked 00:47Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 16 497 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress7 93448.1%
DADemocratic Alliance3 47821.1%
ACMAfrican Content Movement1 78010.8%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 0826.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters8595.2%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation3442.1%
AICAfrican Independent Congress1601.0%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1440.9%
Nketoane Community MovementNketoane Community Movement1180.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1090.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party770.5%
ActionSA720.4%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress620.4%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress480.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance410.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party380.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement320.2%
COPECongress of the People290.2%
UATUnited Africans Transformation190.1%
APEMOAfrican People's Movement110.1%
CFACommunity First Alliance100.1%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum80.0%
AASDAfrikan Alliance of Social Democrats70.0%
SSDFSetsoto Service Delivery Forum70.0%
BCMTBaahi Civic Movement60.0%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party50.0%
DPSADikwankwetla Party of South Africa50.0%
AULAAll Unemployment Labour Alliance40.0%
SDPService Delivery Party30.0%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization20.0%
EKHETHUEkhethu Peoples Party20.0%
MAP16Mapsixteen Civic Movement10.0%

Council seats · 18 ?

African National Congress9 ward · 0 PR9
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 4 PR4
African Content Movement0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
African Congress for Transformation0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Nketoana ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 6, Nketoana in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

NketoanaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 975 · All 52 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 52 voting districts here (16 774 of 32 883). The IEC publishes 51.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (939); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1091); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 597 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 797 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 780 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 638 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.