DA 48.2%
Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)
- DA 48.2%
- ANC 18.5%
- VF PLUS 9.3%
- Others 24.0%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
PR ballot ? · 44 984 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance21 69048.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress8 33618.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4 1799.3%
ActionSA2 3815.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2 3445.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1 5893.5%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1 0442.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania6091.4%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation2750.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance2630.6%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement2560.6%- ACSAActive Citizens of South Africa2310.5%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement1990.4%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party1820.4%- DITAUTau Dia Rora Cultural and Traditional Lekgotla1690.4%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party1560.3%- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation1060.2%
- VAALVaal Party1000.2%
- SERASedibeng Emfuleni Residents Associations940.2%
UATUnited Africans Transformation930.2%
BOSABuild One South Africa780.2%
ACPAll Citizens Party750.2%- AEFAfrican Economic Freedom490.1%
- ARRC.African Royal Rainbow Congress470.1%
- MOVEMove SA470.1%
APCAfrican People's Convention430.1%- STREWECOStretford Wildebeesfontein Elected Civic Organisation410.1%
- TYMTransformative Yes Movement370.1%
AACAfrican Alliance Congress340.1%
COPECongress of the People310.1%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization250.1%
IRCInternational Revelation Congress240.1%- BUYISABuyisa Community Movement220.0%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance210.0%- VDMVaal River City Democratic Movement190.0%
Elf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South AfricaElf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South Africa190.0%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah160.0%- TRUTHTruth and Solidarity Movement130.0%
- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa120.0%
- FISAFreedom in South Africa100.0%
- ANFAmalgamated National Forum70.0%
- KYPKnow Your Power60.0%
- GAZAGaza Democratic Front50.0%
- AAAAlternative African Allegiance40.0%
- UCOUnified Civic Organisation30.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Emfuleni vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Emfuleni ?
Reported in the ESP app
2000 Ward 14, Emfuleni in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 45
- Ward 12 of 3 voting districts inDA 81.7%
- Ward 21 of 3 voting districts inDA 56.5%
- Ward 31 of 3 voting districts inDA 50.1%
- Ward 42 of 3 voting districts inDA 60.3%
- Ward 51 of 4 voting districts inDA 75.4%
- Ward 71 of 5 voting districts inDA 49.4%
- Ward 81 of 5 voting districts inDA 41.4%
- Ward 92 of 3 voting districts inDA 60.7%
- Ward 112 of 4 voting districts inDA 34.3%
- Ward 121 of 2 voting districts inANC 29.7%
- Ward 132 of 7 voting districts inANC 30.9%
- Ward 141 of 3 voting districts inANC 33.5%
- Ward 161 of 3 voting districts inANC 46.6%
- Ward 182 of 3 voting districts inDA 40.3%
- Ward 191 of 3 voting districts inDA 50.0%
- Ward 201 of 3 voting districts inDA 29.0%
- Ward 221 of 3 voting districts inANC 31.9%
- Ward 231 of 3 voting districts inANC 36.6%
- Ward 253 of 7 voting districts inDA 54.4%
- Ward 261 of 5 voting districts in–
- Ward 271 of 3 voting districts inDA 47.1%
- Ward 281 of 4 voting districts inDA 33.1%
- Ward 331 of 4 voting districts inDA 33.4%
- Ward 421 of 4 voting districts inDA 42.9%
- Ward 433 of 6 voting districts inDA 42.3%
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 17–
- Ward 21Not in yet
- Ward 24Not in yet
- Ward 29Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 31Not in yet
- Ward 32Not in yet
- Ward 34Not in yet
- Ward 35Not in yet
- Ward 36Not in yet
- Ward 37Not in yet
- Ward 38Not in yet
- Ward 39Not in yet
- Ward 40Not in yet
- Ward 41Not in yet
- Ward 44Not in yet
- Ward 45Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 4 750 · 35 of 168 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 35 voting districts with results so far here (39 615 of 71 465). The IEC publishes 51.4%.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8026); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (882); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3247: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (515); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4433); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1429); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1010); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (751); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (709); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3464); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 487 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1492); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2547 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7646); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3859); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2186: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1097 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1083 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3312); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (698); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3247: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1311); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1098); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1605); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (805); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 832 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2473); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 522 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1559); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2186: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2186: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1217); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1080); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2199: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1025); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (758); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2186: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2704); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1393); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2186: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2186: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 818 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2371); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1704); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1047); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (692); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3247: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (873); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3231: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3235: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 51.37%; its own counts give 55.43% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 22:35 SAST.