Lephalale

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 39.7% (Ward ballot)Ward 2: ANC 36.2% (Ward ballot)Ward 5: ANC 61.6% (Ward ballot)Ward 6: ANC 60.8% (Ward ballot)Ward 7: ANC 56.1% (Ward ballot)Ward 8: ANC 60.7% (Ward ballot)Ward 9: ANC 67.1% (Ward ballot)Ward 10: ANC 53.4% (Ward ballot)Ward 11: ANC 63.9% (Ward ballot)Ward 12: ANC 57.8% (Ward ballot)Ward 13: ANC 30.4% (Ward ballot)Ward 14: ANC 29.8% (Ward ballot)Ward 3: DA 52.6% (Ward ballot)Ward 4: DA 47.1% (Ward ballot)Ward 15: DA 55.8% (Ward ballot)
WardsANC 12DA 3darker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward · Dashed: 2016 Ward 4 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC 14 of 30 seats · 16 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 47.1%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

LephalaleAll 84 voting districts in
All 15 wards complete
Turnout48.9%
Voters on the roll76 874
South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)
checked Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 36 084 valid votes

Council seats · 30 ?

  1. African National Congress12 ward · 2 PR14
  2. Democratic Alliance3 ward · 2 PR5
  3. South African Communist Party0 ward · 3 PR3
  4. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 3 PR3
  5. Lephalale New Generation Movement0 ward · 2 PR2
  6. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
  7. African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
  8. On the Move0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Lephalale ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power40hours off4 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 26 hours offMay: 26 hours off26MayJun · Power: 6 hours offJun: 6 hours off6JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 8 hours offSep: 8 hours off8SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2016 Ward 4, Lephalale in 2026 ?

Wards · 15

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 934 · All 84 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 84 voting districts here (37 598 of 76 874). The IEC publishes 49.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3715); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1060 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3094); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1909 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1614 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1017); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (844); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1946); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 499 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2996); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 13:03 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it