Ditsobotla

special votes 5 735 · 96 of 97 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 96 voting districts with results so far here (41 938 of 79 714). The IEC publishes 52.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 753 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (882); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (794); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (723); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 778 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4941); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 717 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (869); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 889 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2601); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (830); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 840 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1919); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 866 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 429 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (773); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1909 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1017); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 15:49 SAST.