Ward 9

Get the app
Voting district 86910228: ANC 44.2% (PR ballot)Voting district 86910240: ANC 38.9% (PR ballot)Boitshoko High School (VD 86910228)Mohadin Community Hall (VD 86910240)
Voting districtsANC 2darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 43.1%down 22.5 pts from 65.6% in 2021

African National Congress · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 2 voting districts in
Turnout48.6%
Voters on the roll4 582
South Africa · Counting21 922 of 23 696 voting districts in (92.5%)
checked Latest results

Elected ward councillor ?

Frans Mathata MaropeAfrican National Congress

Ward ballot ? · 2 195 valid votes

Hours off in Ward 9 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power38hours off5 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 10 hours offMay: 10 hours off10MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 14 hours offAug: 14 hours off14AugSep · Power: 6 hours offSep: 6 hours off6SepOct · Power: 7 hours offOct: 7 hours off7Oct

Voting districts · 2 ?

Candidates · 17

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

ESP areas in this ward · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 2 226 · spoilt 31 · special votes 153 · All 2 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 2 voting districts; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 2 voting districts here (2 228 of 4 582). The IEC publishes 48.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 631 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910228: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (949); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910240: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: JB Marks's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 18:57 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it