No majority

ANC 34 of 82 seats · 42 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 41.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

MadibengAll 183 voting districts in

All 41 wards complete

Turnout49.0%

Voters on the roll255k

South Africa · Counting23 402 of 23 696 voting districts in (98.8%)

checked 11:50Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 120 591 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress50 15841.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters19 56916.2%
DADemocratic Alliance18 84315.6%
ActionSA8 5867.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus7 9176.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party5 5334.6%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1 7811.5%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party1 0040.8%
SAVE SASave South Africa9840.8%
AETAfrican Economic Transformers8410.7%
UATUnited Africans Transformation6150.5%
IPIndependent Party4740.4%
AICAfrican Independent Congress4530.4%
Bophuthatswana Civil MovementBophuthatswana Civil Movement4320.4%
ACPAll Citizens Party4020.3%
APCAfrican People's Convention3830.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement3380.3%
AEFAfrican Economic Freedom2860.2%
SDPService Delivery Party2560.2%
TSOGANGTsogang Civic Movement2090.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2090.2%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party1900.2%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum1680.1%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party1610.1%
ARCAfrican Revolutionary Council1550.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance1010.1%
SAPASouth African Political Association990.1%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation950.1%
FISAFreedom in South Africa900.1%
ERMEconomic Redress Movement660.1%
SLK26Seriti le Kaelo Independent Party560.0%
BBSBadiredi Ba Setšhaba480.0%
PURPLEPurple Party Ikageng300.0%
ACGAgenda To Citizenry Governors260.0%
L.S.MLethabong Service Movement200.0%
RCFRestoration Community Forum130.0%

Council seats · 82 ?

African National Congress29 ward · 5 PR34
Economic Freedom Fighters3 ward · 10 PR13
Democratic Alliance5 ward · 7 PR12
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 ward · 5 PR6
ActionSA0 ward · 5 PR5
South African Communist Party1 ward · 3 PR4
African Christian Democratic Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Al Jama-ah1 ward · 0 PR1
Save South Africa0 ward · 1 PR1
United Africans Transformation0 ward · 1 PR1
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Labour Party of South Africa0 ward · 1 PR1
Community Independant Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Independent councillors1

Hours off in Madibeng ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power3 701hours off350 outages

Water202hours off18 outages

Internet342hours off28 outages

2011 Ward 3, Madibeng in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

On EskomSePush

Local Municipality of MadibengPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 7 679 · All 183 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 183 voting districts here (124 866 of 254 573). The IEC publishes 49.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1556 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 904 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (961); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4026); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 930 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (945); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (634); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 763 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1780 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (984); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 531 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1985: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2471 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1852 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 579 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (723); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3986); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (904); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (976); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2096: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1941: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3248: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:28 SAST.

Madibeng

DC 40% ballot ? · 120 591 valid votes

Council seats · 82 ?

Hours off in Madibeng ?

2011 Ward 3, Madibeng in 2026 ?

Wards · 41

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Get the ESP App