WardsANC 4VF PLUS 1DA 1darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward · Dashed: 2011 Ward 2 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 4 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 35.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KGATELOPELEAll 11 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout57.8%

Voters on the roll9 757

South Africa · Counting23 655 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)

checked 01:28Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 5 534 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress1 97135.6%
DADemocratic Alliance1 09619.8%
RTCRise Tsantsabane Communities1 01218.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance65911.9%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3516.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2765.0%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement731.3%
KSRKhoisan Revolution410.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party220.4%
COPECongress of the People110.2%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change110.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement50.1%
RESTORSARestoration SA40.1%
HFTFHope for the Future20.0%

Council seats · 11 ?

African National Congress4 ward · 0 PR4
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
Rise Tsantsabane Communities0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 ward · 0 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in KGATELOPELE ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 2, KGATELOPELE in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

KgatelopelePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 222 · All 11 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 11 voting districts here (5 641 of 9 757). The IEC publishes 57.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (869); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (634); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 08:34 SAST.