Swartland

Ward 1: 4 of 6 voting districts inWard 2: 1 of 2 voting districts inWard 3: 4 of 5 voting districts inWard 4: 2 of 3 voting districts inWard 5: 1 of 3 voting districts inWard 6: not in yetWard 7: 3 of 4 voting districts inWard 8: not in yetWard 9: not in yetWard 10: 1 of 2 voting districts inWard 11: 1 of 2 voting districts inWard 12: 3 of 4 voting districts in
Partly counted 9No results, yet
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
Swartland20 of 39 voting districts in0 of 12 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Swartland vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Swartland ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power264hours off27 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet53hours off6 outages
May · Power: 82 hours offMay · Internet: 17 hours offMay: 99 hours off99MayJun · Power: 25 hours offJun: 25 hours off25JunJul · Power: 14 hours offJul · Internet: 19 hours offJul: 33 hours off33JulAug · Power: 17 hours offAug: 17 hours off17AugSep · Power: 105 hours offSep: 105 hours off105SepOct · Power: 22 hours offOct · Internet: 17 hours offOct: 39 hours off39Oct

Wards · 12

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 2165 + spoilt 11 != cast 646. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 21 voting districts with results so far here (9 414 of 18 945). The IEC publishes 49.7%.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 28475 differs from the sum of party rows 33093 by 4618; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1928); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1025 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3081); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (702); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 937 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 635 differs from the sum of party rows 2165 by 1530; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:37 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it