WardsANC 5DA 1darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward · Dashed: 2000 Ward 1 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 5 of 12 seats · 7 for a majority

Most party (PR) votes: ANC 38.9%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Kou-KammaAll 27 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout57.9%

Voters on the roll23 971

South Africa · Counting23 649 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)

checked 00:17Latest results

PR ballot ? · 13 700 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress5 32438.9%
PAPatriotic Alliance4 17530.5%
DADemocratic Alliance3 15423.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4513.3%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change2291.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1381.0%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party1090.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party930.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement270.2%

Council seats · 12 ?

African National Congress5 ward · 0 PR5
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 4 PR4
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 2 PR3

Hours off in Kou-Kamma ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power88hours off10 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 1, Kou-Kamma in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

Kou-KammaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 773 · All 27 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 27 voting districts here (13 887 of 23 971). The IEC publishes 58.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1834); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1077 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 538 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 775 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1053 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 621 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1851); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.