Senqu

special votes 2 796 · All 101 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 101 voting districts here (33 388 of 68 463). The IEC publishes 49.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 986 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1030 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 429 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3923); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 748 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 694 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1667 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.