Dihlabeng

special votes 5 480 · All 79 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 79 voting districts here (41 866 of 77 595). The IEC publishes 54.4%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1019 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2993); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1000); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 988 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2993); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1061); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1032 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1058); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 578 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4592); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 707 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 893 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2784); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 687 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2055); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 806 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 740 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 840 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 18:56 SAST.