Kopanong

special votes 2 777 · All 41 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 41 voting districts here (15 990 of 27 245). The IEC publishes 60.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 818 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 845 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3030); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (715); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1017 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 841 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (949); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (937); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.