Mafube

special votes 796 · All 33 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 33 voting districts here (16 496 of 32 190). The IEC publishes 51.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1024 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 553 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (904); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (714); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1920); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1815); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1033 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2889); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 526 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 516 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2005); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (939); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2006); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2071); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3222: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.