ANC 29.2%
Most ward votes
- ANC 29.2%
- ACM 19.6%
- DA 18.2%
- Others 32.9%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Every voting district is in. The IEC hasn't calculated the council's seats yet: they appear here when it does.
Ward ballot ? · 89 973 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress26 29729.2%- ACMAfrican Content Movement17 65919.6%
DADemocratic Alliance16 41218.2%- MAP16Mapsixteen Civic Movement7 2648.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters4 1784.6%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party3 5463.9%- SACPSouth African Communist Party2 0162.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1 8182.0%
DPSADikwankwetla Party of South Africa1 4581.6%- IndependentIndependent candidates1 3861.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 2211.4%- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation8510.9%
- BCMTBaahi Civic Movement7800.9%
- CFACommunity First Alliance7570.8%
APEMOAfrican People's Movement7420.8%- L.E.M.Local Economic Movement5860.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance5520.6%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress4520.5%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement3320.4%
- AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress3070.3%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party2170.2%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum1890.2%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization1800.2%
UATUnited Africans Transformation1800.2%
COPECongress of the People1480.2%
AASDAfrikan Alliance of Social Democrats1220.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah1020.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania870.1%
NFPNational Freedom Party750.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement590.1%
Hours off in Maluti a Phofung ?
Reported in the ESP app
2016 Ward 28, Maluti a Phofung in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 35
- Ward 1DA 37.7%
- Ward 2ANC 27.2%
- Ward 3ANC 28.7%
- Ward 4ANC 33.4%
- Ward 5DA 37.5%
- Ward 6DA 41.1%
- Ward 7ANC 24.2%
- Ward 8ANC 30.8%
- Ward 9MAP16 37.4%
- Ward 10ANC 36.3%
- Ward 11ANC 33.4%
- Ward 12ANC 41.7%
- Ward 13SACP 41.8%
- Ward 15ANC 29.8%
- Ward 16ANC 28.9%
- Ward 17ACM 34.4%
- Ward 18ANC 40.4%
- Ward 19ACM 42.4%
- Ward 20MAP16 37.7%
- Ward 21ACM 44.3%
- Ward 22DA 41.8%
- Ward 23ACM 38.1%
- Ward 24ANC 29.7%
- Ward 25ANC 28.8%
- Ward 26ANC 30.1%
- Ward 27ANC 34.2%
- Ward 28ANC 25.3%
- Ward 29ANC 25.4%
- Ward 30ACM 25.1%
- Ward 31MAP16 26.2%
- Ward 32ANC 23.3%
- Ward 33ANC 35.2%
- Ward 34ACM 29.5%
- Ward 35ANC 36.4%
- Ward 14Tied
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 7 392 · All 236 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 236 voting districts here (91 709 of 189 966). The IEC publishes 48.6%.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1079 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3340); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (841); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1992); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1608); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (742); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 621 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1986); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1545); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2754); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 903 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2895); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (618); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (588); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3605); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 967 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3007); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4427); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 559 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1080); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1062); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (592); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2595); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1990); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1517); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1064 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2890); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 846 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2597); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1065); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1086); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2599); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 658 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1928); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (736); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1096 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 616 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2005); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 949 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2716); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1583); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2296); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (896); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1781); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2066); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 612 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1947); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1276); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (768); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 917 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2821); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2409); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1000); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 957 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2840); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2383); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1037 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2063); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1420); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1053); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (542); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3865); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1747); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1230); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (913); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3997); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 861 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2422); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1042 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 850 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2422); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2315); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1579); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (968); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 635 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1892); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 705 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1797); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1660); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2496); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1457); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1002); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1931); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1543); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1530); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1384); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (760); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1832); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 547 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1637); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1350); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (864); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1682); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1776); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2327); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1627); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2693); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 499 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1750); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 454 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1316); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (482); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2031); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1459); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 925 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2696); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 679 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2029); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1718); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 00:13 SAST.