Mangaung

Ward 1: 1 of 8 voting districts in, PA 39.4% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: 1 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 37.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 10: not in yetWard 11: not in yetWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 14: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 16: not in yetWard 17: 1 of 11 voting districts in, DA 62.2% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 18: 2 of 7 voting districts in, DA 57.3% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 19: not in yetWard 20: 1 of 6 voting districts in, DA 81.1% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 21: not in yetWard 22: not in yetWard 23: not in yetWard 24: not in yetWard 25: not in yetWard 26: not in yetWard 27: not in yetWard 28: not in yetWard 29: not in yetWard 30: not in yetWard 31: not in yetWard 32: not in yetWard 33: not in yetWard 34: not in yetWard 35: not in yetWard 36: not in yetWard 37: not in yetWard 38: not in yetWard 39: not in yetWard 40: not in yetWard 41: not in yetWard 42: not in yetWard 43: 11 of 24 voting districts in, ANC 61.4% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 44: not in yetWard 45: not in yetWard 46: not in yetWard 47: not in yetWard 48: not in yetWard 49: not in yetWard 50: not in yetWard 51: 1 of 13 voting districts in, ANC 67.9% so far (Ward ballot)
WardsANC 3DA 3PA 1Partly counted 7No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 39.6%

Leading on the PR ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · PR ballot
  • ANC 39.6%
  • DA 33.6%
  • VF PLUS 7.5%
  • Others 19.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 400 of 23 696 voting districts in (5.9%)checked Latest results
Mangaung18 of 388 voting districts in0 of 51 wards complete
Turnout so far52.2%
Voters on the roll so far9 956

PR ballot ? · 5 151 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Mangaung vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Mangaung ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power2 591hours off285 outages
Water346hours off35 outages
Internet55hours off4 outages
May · Power: 504 hours offMay · Water: 160 hours offMay · Internet: 26 hours offMay: 690 hours off690MayJun · Power: 259 hours offJun · Water: 53 hours offJun: 312 hours off312JunJul · Power: 481 hours offJul · Water: 28 hours offJul: 509 hours off509JulAug · Power: 297 hours offAug · Water: 15 hours offAug: 312 hours off312AugSep · Power: 509 hours offSep · Water: 86 hours offSep · Internet: 29 hours offSep: 624 hours off624SepOct · Power: 542 hours offOct · Water: 4 hours offOct: 546 hours off546Oct

Wards · 51

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 279 · 18 of 388 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 18 voting districts with results so far here (5 198 of 9 956). The IEC publishes 52.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3208: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2170: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2120: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3208: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:32 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it