Masilonyana

special votes 2 557 · All 38 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 38 voting districts here (16 901 of 32 585). The IEC publishes 52.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 822 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1329: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 677 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 842 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 968 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1329: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1704); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1329: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 695 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1329: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 625 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (852); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1329: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (802); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2036: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 17:00 SAST.