Matjhabeng

special votes 12 409 · 159 of 177 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 159 voting districts with results so far here (92 334 of 182 662). The IEC publishes 50.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 894 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 541 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2063); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 981 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 601 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 867 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 718 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (723); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 938 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 927 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2946); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 802 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 690 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 729 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 802 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1983 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1706 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1785 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1065 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (698); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 908 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 617 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 616 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 907 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 883 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 429 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3951); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2045: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 18:39 SAST.