Metsimaholo

special votes 4 803 · 87 of 88 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 87 voting districts with results so far here (54 968 of 106 884). The IEC publishes 51.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1039 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (900); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 753 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 805 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 625 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1072); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (893); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (844); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 626 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2004); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (986); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 852 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1071); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1038); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 835 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1038 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2060 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 398 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 917 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3220: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (984); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1980: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1859: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3219: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3271: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:56 SAST.