Moqhaka

special votes 3 500 · All 98 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 98 voting districts here (38 115 of 81 781). The IEC publishes 47.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 789 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 785 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (865); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 963 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2894); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 684 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 842 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 761 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 858 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 513 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 677 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 987 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1641: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2165: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 490 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1847: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1494: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1994: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1974: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 23:01 SAST.