WardsANC 4VF PLUS 1Partly counted 5No results, yetdarker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC 40.3%

Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · DC 40% ballot

ANC 40.3%
DA 24.6%
VF PLUS 15.6%
Others 19.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 400 of 23 696 voting districts in (5.9%)checked 03:29Latest results

Phumelela16 of 43 voting districts in0 of 8 wards complete

Turnout so far50.4%

Voters on the roll so far4 130

DC 40% ballot ? · 2 044 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress82340.3%
DADemocratic Alliance50224.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus31915.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1004.9%
SDPService Delivery Party964.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party844.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement211.0%
SACPSouth African Communist Party201.0%
AICAfrican Independent Congress190.9%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party110.5%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress80.4%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation70.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party60.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance50.2%
ACMAfrican Content Movement40.2%
ActionSA40.2%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum30.1%
COPECongress of the People20.1%
APEMOAfrican People's Movement20.1%
SSDFSetsoto Service Delivery Forum20.1%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization20.1%
AASDAfrikan Alliance of Social Democrats10.0%
UATUnited Africans Transformation10.0%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress10.0%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement10.0%

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Phumelela vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Phumelela ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power67hours off8 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

PhumelelaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 73 · 16 of 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 16 voting districts with results so far here (2 082 of 4 130). The IEC publishes 50.2%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:22 SAST.