Setsoto

special votes 4 552 · All 71 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 71 voting districts here (29 208 of 60 134). The IEC publishes 48.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1079 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 926 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1047); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1085 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 985 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3058); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 560 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 653 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2053); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1080 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 909 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (897); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 844 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (823); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (824); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1509: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3217: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (717); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1357: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 961 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 22:04 SAST.