WardsANC 7darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 3 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

7 of 13 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 51.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

TokologoAll 29 voting districts in

All 7 wards complete

Turnout57.1%

Voters on the roll15 311

South Africa · Counting22 581 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.3%)

checked 21:52Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 8 627 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress4 42951.3%
DADemocratic Alliance1 35915.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 10012.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party96911.2%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4845.6%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement1351.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance420.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party410.5%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement390.5%
IndependentIndependent candidates150.2%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation140.2%

Council seats · 13 ?

African National Congress7 ward · 0 PR7
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Tokologo ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 3, Tokologo in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

TokologoPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 346 · All 29 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 29 voting districts here (8 746 of 15 311). The IEC publishes 57.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 796 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2125: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 14:01 SAST.