WardsANC 8Partly counted 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2016 Ward 1 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 8 of 16 seats · 9 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 51.7%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Tswelopele38 of 39 voting districts in

7 of 8 wards complete

Turnout so far56.9%

Voters on the roll so far28 107

South Africa · Counting22 490 of 23 696 voting districts in (94.9%)

checked 21:29Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 15 653 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress8 09151.7%
DADemocratic Alliance3 31521.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 65710.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 3478.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus5833.7%
TYPTikwana Youth Power3222.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1681.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance540.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement440.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party320.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania310.2%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation90.1%

Council seats · 16 ?

African National Congress8 ward · 0 PR8
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 4 PR4
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Tswelopele vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Tswelopele ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power16hours off2 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2016 Ward 1, Tswelopele in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Ward 1All of 2016 ward 1 · 2026: ANC 61.8%

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

TswelopelePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 916 · 38 of 39 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 38 voting districts with results so far here (15 984 of 28 075). The IEC publishes 56.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1060 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 970 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 995 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 760 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1891: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1620: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:47 SAST.