No majority
DA 74 of 214 seats · 108 for a majority
Most ward votes: DA 34.7%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 896 474 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance311 17534.7%
ActionSA184 88420.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress181 37720.2%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus69 2067.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters53 2605.9%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party18 9592.1%- SACPSouth African Communist Party12 1511.4%
PAPatriotic Alliance6 4250.7%
RISERise Mzansi5 4410.6%- IndependentIndependent candidates5 3970.6%
- SPPSASecurity Personnel Party of South Africa5 2710.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress4 6450.5%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2 9900.3%
BOSABuild One South Africa2 2420.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party2 1730.2%- SDPService Delivery Party2 1150.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1 7670.2%- UPPAUnited Progressive People Alliance1 7060.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1 5620.2%
APCAfrican People's Convention1 5600.2%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress1 5000.2%- CONCERN1 3990.2%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party1 3710.2%
UATUnited Africans Transformation1 1620.1%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation9510.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah8900.1%
COPECongress of the People8390.1%- RDResident Development8300.1%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement8130.1%
Elf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South AfricaElf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South Africa7010.1%- UMBRELLAAllied Independents Umbrella6750.1%
- BPCSDTBatho Pele Community Service Delivery Tshwane6330.1%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum6000.1%- SAMMOSouth African Mass Movement5690.1%
IRCInternational Revelation Congress5630.1%
AGANG SAAgang South Africa5470.1%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance5070.1%- RCRepublican Conference of Tshwane4630.1%
ACPAll Citizens Party4250.0%- TRUTHTruth and Solidarity Movement4120.0%
- AACUMActive African Christians United Movement4040.0%
ICMIndependent Citizens Movement4030.0%- FISAFreedom in South Africa3620.0%
ARECOArusha Economic Coalition3270.0%
BPSABolsheviks Party of South Africa3180.0%
UIMUnited Independent Movement2990.0%- MOSHABIMoshabi Party2750.0%
- PTA012Progressive Tshwane Alliance-Pta0122600.0%
- EKHETHUEkhethu Peoples Party2510.0%
- KYPKnow Your Power2500.0%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement2400.0%
MFMinority Front2270.0%
URFUnited Residents Front2220.0%
FPSAFederal Party SA2110.0%
O.DOperation Dudula1990.0%- ARDAfrica Redemption Democracy1860.0%
- CCCNational Coloured Congress1720.0%
- Bophuthatswana Civil MovementBophuthatswana Civil Movement1680.0%
PRPPoelano Revelation Party1570.0%
LANDLand Party1520.0%
NADECONational Democratic Convention1410.0%
INGUBOAbafuna Ingubo Yeskhethu Party1410.0%- DOPDefenders of the People1240.0%
- MAWUSAMawusa Movement Party1210.0%
- DITAUTau Dia Rora Cultural and Traditional Lekgotla1010.0%
- NEGEPA7Region 7 New Generation Party950.0%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity940.0%- ARRC.African Royal Rainbow Congress940.0%
- S.A.P.South African Party750.0%
NFPNational Freedom Party480.0%- LBKPLekwe Bepe Kingdom Party430.0%
- AIPOAfrican Independent People's Organisation370.0%
- ERMEconomic Redress Movement270.0%
- INIlizwe Nathi260.0%
- GAZAGaza Democratic Front230.0%
- A.T.C.African Traditional Congres150.0%
- ALAMAfrican Liberation Alliance Movement140.0%
- CKPChrist Kingdom Party140.0%
- MA AFRIKAAfrika Unite Congress20.0%
Council seats · 214 ?
- Democratic Alliance37 ward · 37 PR74
- ActionSA26 ward · 22 PR48
- African National Congress44 ward · 0 PR44
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 17 PR17
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 13 PR13
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 4 PR4
- South African Communist Party0 ward · 3 PR3
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
- African Christian Democratic Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- African Independent Congress0 ward · 1 PR1
- African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
- United Africans Transformation0 ward · 1 PR1
- Build One South Africa0 ward · 1 PR1
- Rise Mzansi0 ward · 1 PR1
- Service Delivery Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- Afrika Mayibuye Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
- Security Personnel Party of South Africa0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in City of Tshwane ?
Reported in the ESP app
2011 Ward 7, Tshwane Metro in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 107
- Ward 1DA 63.0%
- Ward 2DA 63.9%
- Ward 3ActionSA 33.2%
- Ward 4ActionSA 46.9%
- Ward 5DA 63.0%
- Ward 6ANC 31.2%
- Ward 7ActionSA 33.5%
- Ward 8ANC 32.4%
- Ward 9ANC 42.9%
- Ward 10ANC 28.8%
- Ward 11ANC 35.4%
- Ward 12ANC 54.4%
- Ward 13ANC 39.4%
- Ward 14ANC 33.5%
- Ward 15ANC 40.9%
- Ward 16ActionSA 37.1%
- Ward 17ANC 35.5%
- Ward 18ANC 35.0%
- Ward 19ANC 53.4%
- Ward 20ActionSA 34.3%
- Ward 21ActionSA 42.4%
- Ward 22ANC 34.4%
- Ward 23ANC 39.4%
- Ward 24ANC 46.7%
- Ward 25ANC 37.6%
- Ward 26ANC 37.7%
- Ward 27ANC 37.1%
- Ward 28ANC 30.8%
- Ward 29ANC 35.5%
- Ward 30ActionSA 29.7%
- Ward 31ANC 26.1%
- Ward 32ActionSA 34.3%
- Ward 33ActionSA 31.1%
- Ward 34ActionSA 35.9%
- Ward 35ActionSA 29.3%
- Ward 36ActionSA 47.8%
- Ward 37ActionSA 30.5%
- Ward 38ActionSA 34.1%
- Ward 39ANC 38.5%
- Ward 40ANC 33.9%
- Ward 41DA 61.6%
- Ward 42DA 76.3%
- Ward 43DA 38.2%
- Ward 44DA 80.7%
- Ward 45DA 75.9%
- Ward 46DA 77.1%
- Ward 47DA 76.3%
- Ward 48DA 43.6%
- Ward 49ANC 35.3%
- Ward 50DA 63.4%
- Ward 51ActionSA 38.0%
- Ward 52DA 64.7%
- Ward 53DA 55.4%
- Ward 54DA 64.5%
- Ward 55DA 41.9%
- Ward 56DA 46.8%
- Ward 57DA 47.5%
- Ward 58ActionSA 35.2%
- Ward 59DA 39.7%
- Ward 60ActionSA 35.4%
- Ward 61ANC 45.1%
- Ward 62ActionSA 36.2%
- Ward 63ActionSA 42.1%
- Ward 64DA 47.9%
- Ward 65DA 60.3%
- Ward 66DA 73.5%
- Ward 67ANC 42.1%
- Ward 68ActionSA 36.3%
- Ward 69DA 76.8%
- Ward 70DA 60.2%
- Ward 71ANC 44.8%
- Ward 72ANC 30.9%
- Ward 73ANC 33.2%
- Ward 74ActionSA 34.8%
- Ward 75ActionSA 28.8%
- Ward 76ANC 35.7%
- Ward 77ActionSA 35.7%
- Ward 78DA 61.5%
- Ward 79DA 69.5%
- Ward 80ActionSA 35.0%
- Ward 81ActionSA 43.5%
- Ward 82DA 79.9%
- Ward 83DA 75.2%
- Ward 84DA 62.6%
- Ward 85DA 75.8%
- Ward 86ActionSA 30.3%
- Ward 87DA 46.3%
- Ward 88ANC 40.3%
- Ward 89ANC 32.0%
- Ward 90ANC 46.4%
- Ward 91DA 60.5%
- Ward 92ActionSA 37.1%
- Ward 93ANC 34.9%
- Ward 94ANC 44.1%
- Ward 95ANC 34.4%
- Ward 96DA 52.3%
- Ward 97ANC 35.5%
- Ward 98DA 45.2%
- Ward 99ANC 31.7%
- Ward 100DA 40.1%
- Ward 101DA 72.4%
- Ward 102DA 43.5%
- Ward 103ANC 40.7%
- Ward 104ANC 33.3%
- Ward 105ANC 48.6%
- Ward 106ANC 33.0%
- Ward 107ANC 39.8%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 71 007 · All 796 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 796 voting districts here (908 472 of 1 684 463). The IEC publishes 54.4%.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4403); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2183); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (891); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6919 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3039); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (926); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5086); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2596); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2593); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1572); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5989 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3951); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1064 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1996); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (836); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7998 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15842); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1471 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3069); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1089); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4496); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4727); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1167); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8408); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2736 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5569); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2486); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1098 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2097); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (830); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4734); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2964); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1090 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (946); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (641); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4358); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1653); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 727 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1434); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (921); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3016); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2305); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1824); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2083 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3428); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 536 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (888); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5520); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (939); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4494); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2467); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1429); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1885 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3982); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2023); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1737); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4743 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8996); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2825 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5819); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 973 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2007); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1046); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6903); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6466); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 652 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1297); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4748); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3993); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 526 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (928); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5178); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (910); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6478); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2492); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (738); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5527); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1982 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4040); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1393); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 763 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1562); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (943); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (558); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6680); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1696); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (971); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4538); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1560 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4715); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1789 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3593); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (930); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (673); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 893 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1852); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 880 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1604); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1908); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (823); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2993 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5840); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1907); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 631 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1220); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4511); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3409); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 760 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1434); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (837); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (773); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4686); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2721); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1913); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1460); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3447); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3431); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (848); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4355); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3029); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 903 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1686); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1037); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5491); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 579 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1055); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3726); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3834); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2340); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7075); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4709); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1091 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4961); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4562); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 986 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1832); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4410); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (838); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1915 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4544); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3696); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 487 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (994); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8627); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4020); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1741); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 742 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1433); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4993); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1001 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1887); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1471 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3062); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1090 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 668 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1321); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (709); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2510); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1497); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3740); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3042); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 800 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1624); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 629 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1217); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12711); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2628); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1091); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (661); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16885); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2894); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (805); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7638); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4505); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2593); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 797 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1794); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (994); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15983); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1093 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2350); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10000 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19826); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1566); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (808); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3000); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10654 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21061); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4561); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6848 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13380); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8865); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1847 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3448); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 978 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1828); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4930); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1688 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3423); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2572); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 614 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1191); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14385); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4483); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1903 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3654); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 531 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1079); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (885); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 51: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6535 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5900); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 52: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9757); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3804); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 958 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2022); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 53: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5979 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11850); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 54: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3943 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4710); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3099); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 910 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1854); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 55: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3944 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7732); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3820); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2055); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 532 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (868); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 56: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9085); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4474); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3070); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (886); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 57: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5530); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3373); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2596); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1451); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1004); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 58: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3339); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1022); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1015); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 59: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7384); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4063); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1287); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 60: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3833 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3818); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (692); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 61: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4908); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (982); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (714); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 62: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3474); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 514 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (995); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (786); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 63: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6056 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11439); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3579 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7552); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1989); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1903); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1076); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 64: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12632); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3633); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2222); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 559 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 65: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1826 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3793); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1075); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 66: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4743); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3259); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1093); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (646); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 67: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4671); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4437); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 623 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 68: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18717); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1932 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3796); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (944); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 69: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 959 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1926); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (530); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 70: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1995 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3966); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 71: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1832 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3826); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3780); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1548); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 672 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 72: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3005 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3699); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3305); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (797); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 73: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1813 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3624); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3007); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 74: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2024 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4427); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3947); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1092 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1097); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (790); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 75: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1933 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3944); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2141); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2058); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (676); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (482); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 76: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6804); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1927 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3825); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2921); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2496); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 77: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4880 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9738); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2635); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 78: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8913 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17729); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4733); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1622); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 79: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1874 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3916); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2034); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 80: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3349); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1316); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 81: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15091); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1889); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (817); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 82: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7829 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15514); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3058); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 487 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1055); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 83: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13999); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3039 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5556); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1042); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 84: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9696 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2704); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 981 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1014); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 85: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1561 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3072); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 535 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 86: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10095); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2006 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3608); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2912); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2426); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (736); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 87: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2638 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5032); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1850 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3918); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 908 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1806); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (899); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 88: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1905 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3985); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1582); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 89: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7878); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5545); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 866 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1769); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1523); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 90: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3257); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1748 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1655); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (566); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 91: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1746 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1667); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 742 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1425); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 92: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5327); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2017 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 793 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1557); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1453); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (746); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 93: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2688 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1847 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4032); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 94: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4948); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2729); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 921 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1583); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1775); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (951); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 95: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12074); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3984); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 870 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1867); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (815); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 96: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1578 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3191); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1053); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 97: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4754 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8721); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6690); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 848 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1866); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1610); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (903); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 98: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1951 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 896 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1844); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1684); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (865); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 99: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5583); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1835 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3626); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 893 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1831); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 840 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1781); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 100: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10791 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21012); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2755); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1486); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 101: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2873); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 102: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5880); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2092); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 726 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2074); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1404); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (755); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 103: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6500); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3443); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1532 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2973); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (741); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 104: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3927 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8011); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 971 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2073); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 886 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1762); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 789 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1401); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1061); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 105: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2705 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5327); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5307); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1001 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1965); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1850); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (685); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 106: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2742 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5534); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2399); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1351); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1773: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1590: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2161: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1287: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 3270: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1595: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 928: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2003: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 938: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1654: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1858: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 3212: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2178: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 107: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.