Lesedi

special votes 3 103 · 39 of 40 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 39 voting districts with results so far here (31 312 of 52 961). The IEC publishes 56.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 864 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1068); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 820 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2054: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2890); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 903 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3218: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 868 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1652: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1803: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1556: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3209: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 56.49%; its own counts give 59.12% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.