Merafong City

special votes 5 157 · All 77 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 77 voting districts here (49 599 of 98 869). The IEC publishes 50.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 806 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 998 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (601); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3688); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1869); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (851); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1063); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1790 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 980 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 829 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1098); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 797 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1097); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2077); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1851: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1095 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1991: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2010: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.