Ward 2

Get the app
Voting district 32930737: DA 85.7% (PR ballot)Risiville Laerskool (VD 32930737)
Voting districtsDA 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

DA 86.5%down 2.7 pts from 89.2% in 2021

Democratic Alliance · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 1 voting districts in
Turnout72.3%
Voters on the roll3 774
South Africa · Counting16 469 of 23 696 voting districts in (69.5%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 2 689 valid votes

Hours off in Ward 2 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power412hours off24 outages
Water109hours off12 outages
Internet30hours off4 outages
May · Power: 82 hours offMay · Water: 31 hours offMay · Internet: 15 hours offMay: 128 hours off128MayJun · Power: 65 hours offJun · Water: 32 hours offJun: 97 hours off97JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 26 hours offAug · Water: 36 hours offAug: 62 hours off62AugSep · Power: 144 hours offSep · Water: 10 hours offSep: 154 hours off154SepOct · Power: 96 hours offOct · Internet: 15 hours offOct: 111 hours off111Oct

Voting districts · 1 ?

Candidates · 18

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

ESP areas in this ward · 5 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 2 709 · spoilt 20 · special votes 221 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 1 voting district; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 1 voting district here (2 727 of 3 774). The IEC publishes 72.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1578: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1870: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 32930737: party 1712: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Midvaal's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 01:37 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it