No majority
DA 27 of 77 seats · 39 for a majority
Most ward votes: DA 36.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 110 501 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance40 49036.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress28 89026.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus10 0849.1%
ActionSA9 5508.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters9 0448.2%- SACPSouth African Communist Party2 0141.8%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1 5931.4%
RISERise Mzansi1 1121.0%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party9220.8%- IndependentIndependent candidates9040.8%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania7370.7%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement7330.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement6610.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress6410.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance6240.6%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah4870.4%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party4810.4%- UMBRELLAAllied Independents Umbrella4580.4%
BOSABuild One South Africa2930.3%- MAWUSAMawusa Movement Party2570.2%
APCAfrican People's Convention1990.2%
Elf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South AfricaElf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South Africa830.1%- H.JHuconomics Justice830.1%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement780.1%
UATUnited Africans Transformation510.0%- AAAMAll African Alliance Movement320.0%
Council seats · 77 ?
- Democratic Alliance16 ward · 11 PR27
- African National Congress23 ward · 0 PR23
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 7 PR7
- ActionSA0 ward · 7 PR7
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 6 PR6
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 2 PR2
- Inkatha Freedom Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- Pan Africanist Congress of Azania0 ward · 1 PR1
- South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
- Rise Mzansi0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in Mogale City ?
Reported in the ESP app
2016 Ward 34, Mogale City in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 39
- Ward 1ANC 62.6%
- Ward 2ANC 41.9%
- Ward 3ANC 61.3%
- Ward 4ANC 37.4%
- Ward 5ANC 39.0%
- Ward 6ANC 29.1%
- Ward 7ANC 32.6%
- Ward 8ANC 40.6%
- Ward 9DA 35.8%
- Ward 10ANC 34.5%
- Ward 11ANC 32.2%
- Ward 12ANC 29.2%
- Ward 13ANC 30.0%
- Ward 14ANC 36.9%
- Ward 15DA 31.0%
- Ward 16DA 34.5%
- Ward 17DA 63.0%
- Ward 18DA 68.3%
- Ward 19ANC 31.3%
- Ward 20DA 50.7%
- Ward 21DA 71.2%
- Ward 22DA 73.7%
- Ward 23DA 34.6%
- Ward 24ANC 45.6%
- Ward 25ANC 40.0%
- Ward 26DA 51.7%
- Ward 27ANC 46.9%
- Ward 28DA 71.6%
- Ward 29DA 72.8%
- Ward 30ANC 51.1%
- Ward 31ANC 30.7%
- Ward 32ANC 37.4%
- Ward 33DA 47.6%
- Ward 34ANC 40.6%
- Ward 35ANC 44.3%
- Ward 36ANC 31.5%
- Ward 37DA 68.2%
- Ward 38DA 55.8%
- Ward 39DA 50.7%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 13 390 · All 115 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 115 voting districts here (112 310 of 202 233). The IEC publishes 55.9%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3539); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1003 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3091); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (982); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1753 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4978); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1008); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 848 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (797); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (836); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 982 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2949); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1434); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1037); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1917); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1416); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 972 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2739); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2009); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 547 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (858); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 973 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2698); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1256); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1230); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (673); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1088 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3263); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 499 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1576); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1525); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2578); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (954); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2608); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1764); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1686); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (606); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1011 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 796 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1801); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1098); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1089); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1467); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1287); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1043 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2498); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (963); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (740); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6169); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 907 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2591); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9502); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3539); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 709 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2096); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1349); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1020); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3891); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1509); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (699); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9082); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1007 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2937); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2829 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8549); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1057 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3341); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1625); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 983 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2832); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1399); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2897); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1673); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3470); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1000); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (813); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3944); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 578 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1731); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (973); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2919 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8682); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (920); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (902); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (917); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7528); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2090); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1696 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5049); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2624); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (943); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (661); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 924 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2852); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 493 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1415); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (928); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 760 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2316); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 629 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1864); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1086 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 671 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2026); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1258); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3382); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1097); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (679); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (629); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1773); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1032); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1855: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6978); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2623); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1709 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5062); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 685 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2084); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (688); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1913 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5575); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2640); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 510 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1621); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 17:51 SAST.