Rand West City

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 56.7%Ward 3: DA 40.2%Ward 4: DA 42.4%Ward 5: ANC 38.9%Ward 6: DA 67.6%Ward 7: DA 61.9%Ward 8: DA 29.3%Ward 9: DA 68.6%Ward 10: DA 40.0%Ward 11: ANC 37.3%Ward 12: ANC 42.5%Ward 13: ANC 34.2%Ward 14: ANC 42.3%Ward 15: ANC 32.5%Ward 16: ANC 40.3%Ward 17: ANC 37.4%Ward 18: ANC 34.8%Ward 19: ANC 35.4%Ward 20: DA 42.5%Ward 21: ANC 35.7%Ward 22: ANC 47.8%Ward 24: ANC 28.7%Ward 26: ANC 40.8%Ward 27: ANC 52.2%Ward 28: ANC 42.7%Ward 29: ANC 45.7%Ward 31: ANC 50.6%Ward 32: ANC 25.8%Ward 33: ANC 36.5%Ward 34: ANC 61.2%Ward 2: ANC 26.4%Ward 23: SACP 30.8%Ward 25: ANC 32.9%Ward 30: ANC 38.8%Ward 35: DA 46.9%
WardsANC 25DA 9SACP 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2016 Ward 25 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC 24 of 69 seats · 35 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 33.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Rand West CityAll 86 voting districts in
All 35 wards complete
Turnout51.7%
Voters on the roll142k
South Africa · Counting23 429 of 23 696 voting districts in (98.9%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 72 129 valid votes

Council seats · 69 ?

Hours off in Rand West City ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power876hours off90 outages
Water69hours off7 outages
Internet31hours off2 outages
May · Power: 103 hours offMay: 103 hours off103MayJun · Power: 46 hours offJun: 46 hours off46JunJul · Power: 134 hours offJul · Water: 29 hours offJul: 163 hours off163JulAug · Power: 155 hours offAug: 155 hours off155AugSep · Power: 149 hours offSep · Internet: 31 hours offSep: 180 hours off180SepOct · Power: 288 hours offOct · Water: 40 hours offOct: 328 hours off328Oct

2016 Ward 25, Randfontein/Westonaria in 2026 ?

Wards · 35

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 10 219 · All 86 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 86 voting districts here (73 394 of 142 004). The IEC publishes 52.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1005 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2758); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 763 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (802); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 851 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (830); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (824); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1002 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2995); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1515); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (939); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (840); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 577 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 754 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 939 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2524); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 617 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1814); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 516 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 729 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (837); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (711); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1512: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2173: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1783: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 12:19 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it