Dannhauser

special votes 2 639 · All 63 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 63 voting districts here (31 067 of 57 185). The IEC publishes 54.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 953 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 625 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 745 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1026); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 707 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1550 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 958 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3030); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 616 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1724); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (893); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 429 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1973: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1776: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.