WardsIFP 6MKP 3ANC 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 5 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

IFP 6 of 19 seats · 10 for a majority

Most ward votes: IFP 32.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

eDumbeAll 68 voting districts in

All 10 wards complete

Turnout57.6%

Voters on the roll44 608

South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)

checked 01:11Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 25 391 valid votes

IFPInkatha Freedom Party8 18832.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party6 66326.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress4 53017.8%
NFPNational Freedom Party1 8807.4%
NPANational Peoples Ambassadors9933.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters9253.6%
DADemocratic Alliance8593.4%
NPPNyoni Progress Party5262.1%
SACPSouth African Communist Party3761.5%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement1520.6%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1110.4%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa480.2%
AEFAfrican Economic Freedom450.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania440.2%
A.B.C.D.Abantu Bezwelethu Congress Democracy330.1%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity180.1%

Council seats · 19 ?

Inkatha Freedom Party6 ward · 0 PR6
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party3 ward · 2 PR5
African National Congress1 ward · 2 PR3
National Freedom Party0 ward · 2 PR2
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
National Peoples Ambassadors0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in eDumbe ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power7hours off1 outage

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 5, eDumbe in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 10

On EskomSePush

eDumbePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 607 · All 68 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 68 voting districts here (25 688 of 44 608). The IEC publishes 57.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1039 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3079); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (784); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1078 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1742); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2079); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 815 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2000); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 499 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1050 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1042); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (982); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2042: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 14:39 SAST.