WardsMKP 5DA 2IFP 1darker = bigger win

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

MKP 5 of 15 seats · 8 for a majority

Most ward votes: MKP 31.8%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

eNdumeniAll 27 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout53.7%

Voters on the roll35 924

South Africa · Counting18 651 of 23 696 voting districts in (78.7%)

checked 11:08Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 19 114 valid votes

MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party6 08131.8%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party4 72624.7%
DADemocratic Alliance2 88115.1%
ANCAfrican National Congress2 50413.1%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 0545.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus9925.2%
IndependentIndependent candidates4312.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance1640.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1340.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement670.4%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement230.1%
NADECONational Democratic Convention210.1%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa150.1%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity120.1%
AEFAfrican Economic Freedom90.0%

Council seats · 15 ?

Umkhonto Wesizwe Party5 ward · 0 PR5
Inkatha Freedom Party1 ward · 3 PR4
African National Congress0 ward · 2 PR2
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 0 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in eNdumeni ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power49hours off6 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet9hours off1 outage

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

EndumeniPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 162 · All 27 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 27 voting districts here (19 305 of 35 924). The IEC publishes 53.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 845 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 737 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 655 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1961); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 10:08 SAST.