Greater Kokstad

special votes 4 842 · All 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 43 voting districts here (25 394 of 48 778). The IEC publishes 52.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3939); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (945); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 578 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (773); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1085 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 905 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 553 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1698); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 812 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:18 SAST.