WardsANC 11darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2006 Ward 3 (2006 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

11 of 21 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 47.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Greater KokstadAll 43 voting districts in

All 11 wards complete

Turnout52.1%

Voters on the roll48 778

South Africa · Counting23 640 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)

checked 22:13Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 24 718 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress11 73547.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party5 42021.9%
DADemocratic Alliance2 98612.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 8817.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance6272.5%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement4611.9%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4171.7%
AICAfrican Independent Congress4061.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party3881.6%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party2651.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement760.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania440.2%
B.M.Bumbana Mzansi120.0%

Council seats · 21 ?

African National Congress11 ward · 0 PR11
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 4 PR4
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Greater Kokstad ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power81hours off13 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2006 Ward 3 in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 11

On EskomSePush

Greater KokstadPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 842 · All 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 43 voting districts here (25 394 of 48 778). The IEC publishes 52.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3939); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (945); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 578 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (773); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1085 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 905 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 553 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1698); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 812 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:18 SAST.