iMpendle

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: 1 of 5 voting districts in, MKP 50.0% so farWard 5: 1 of 5 voting districts in, IND 46.5% so farWard 6: 3 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 41.9% so far
WardsMKP 1IND 1ANC 1Partly counted 3No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 36.1%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 36.1%
  • MKP 30.3%
  • DA 14.6%
  • Others 18.9%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 114 of 23 696 voting districts in (4.7%)checked Latest results
iMpendle5 of 32 voting districts in0 of 6 wards complete
Turnout so far59.2%
Voters on the roll so far1 695

Ward ballot ? · 999 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did iMpendle vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in iMpendle ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power8hours off1 outage
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 8 hours offSep: 8 hours off8SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 113 · 5 of 32 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 5 voting districts with results so far here (1 004 of 1 695). The IEC publishes 59.4%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:50 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it