Johannes Phumani Pungula

special votes 2 500 · All 83 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 83 voting districts here (35 370 of 62 183). The IEC publishes 57.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1047 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3837); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (824); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 487 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4098); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 660 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 833 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 832 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 872 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1056 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 955 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:26 SAST.