KwaDukuza

special votes 6 587 · All 96 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 96 voting districts here (100 379 of 168 072). The IEC publishes 60.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 985 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2990); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 968 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 633 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 855 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1027 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3093); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 538 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1398 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4018); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1813 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 985 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1771 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1893); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1054 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 785 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (706); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1095 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 553 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 796 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1801); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1744 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 729 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 672 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 996 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2928); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2634); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1094 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1927 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1958 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3715); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (983); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 981 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 899 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.