Maphumulo

special votes 1 691 · All 103 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 103 voting districts here (31 151 of 55 772). The IEC publishes 56.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 636 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 614 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 726 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 734 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3026); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1069 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4098); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 924 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 696 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1951); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 805 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 897 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 710 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 19:47 SAST.