WardsMKP 3DA 2IFP 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2021 Ward 1 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

MKP 4 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: MKP 32.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

MpofanaAll 29 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout58.1%

Voters on the roll18 653

South Africa · Counting23 640 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)

checked 22:01Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 10 587 valid votes

MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party3 41832.3%
ANCAfrican National Congress3 18030.0%
DADemocratic Alliance1 86017.6%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party9328.8%
INDIndependent Councillors8508.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2021.9%
SACPSouth African Communist Party600.6%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement430.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement360.3%
IndependentIndependent candidates60.1%

Council seats · 11 ?

Umkhonto Wesizwe Party3 ward · 1 PR4
African National Congress0 ward · 3 PR3
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 0 PR2
Inkatha Freedom Party1 ward · 0 PR1
Independent Councillors0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Mpofana ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2021 Ward 1, Mpofana in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

MpofanaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 512 · All 29 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 29 voting districts here (10 839 of 18 653). The IEC publishes 58.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1482); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1037 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1085); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1661); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 14:02 SAST.