Nongoma

Get the app
Ward 1: IFP 38.9%Ward 2: IFP 49.9%Ward 3: ANC 35.5%Ward 4: IFP 53.0%Ward 5: IFP 47.8%Ward 6: IFP 59.4%Ward 8: IFP 45.4%Ward 9: IFP 46.9%Ward 10: IFP 46.3%Ward 11: IFP 49.0%Ward 12: IFP 66.9%Ward 13: IFP 59.1%Ward 14: IFP 44.8%Ward 15: IFP 83.7%Ward 16: IFP 53.1%Ward 17: IFP 49.3%Ward 18: IFP 50.2%Ward 19: IFP 62.8%Ward 20: IFP 50.2%Ward 21: IFP 46.1%Ward 22: IFP 59.4%Ward 23: MKP 40.8%Ward 7: IFP 59.8%
WardsIFP 21ANC 1MKP 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 7 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

IFP majority

23 of 45 seats

Most ward votes: IFP 50.8%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

NongomaAll 125 voting districts in
All 23 wards complete
Turnout50.0%
Voters on the roll110k
South Africa · Counting23 647 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 54 704 valid votes

Council seats · 45 ?

  1. Inkatha Freedom Party21 ward · 2 PR23
  2. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party1 ward · 8 PR9
  3. African National Congress1 ward · 4 PR5
  4. National Freedom Party0 ward · 5 PR5
  5. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
  6. National People's Front0 ward · 1 PR1
  7. African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Nongoma ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power13hours off1 outage
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 13 hours offSep: 13 hours off13SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2011 Ward 7, Nongoma in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 23

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 5 273 · All 125 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 125 voting districts here (55 095 of 110 230). The IEC publishes 50.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 984 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1723); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (961); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1038 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3011); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 396 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 894 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3676); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 541 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1600); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1011); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1058 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1055); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (925); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (971); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2061); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1068); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2056 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1088 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1057 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1087 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 666 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 854 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1024 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 989 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2146: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:57 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it