No majority
IFP and MKP 8 seats each of 29 · 15 for a majority
Most ward votes: IFP 26.3%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 37 572 valid votes
IFPInkatha Freedom Party9 90026.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party9 36924.9%
ANCAfrican National Congress6 68117.8%
NPANational Peoples Ambassadors2 9217.8%
DADemocratic Alliance2 4696.6%
APEMOAfrican People's Movement2 3466.2%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 5604.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters4581.2%
NFPNational Freedom Party3701.0%- NEFANational Economic Freedom Alliance3190.8%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2500.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement2360.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress2010.5%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1030.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party990.3%- IndependentIndependent candidates610.2%
ACAfrican Mantungwa Community550.1%
UCMUnited Cultural Movement450.1%- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation370.1%
- A.B.C.D.Abantu Bezwelethu Congress Democracy360.1%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity300.1%
IRCInternational Revelation Congress260.1%
Council seats · 29 ?
- Inkatha Freedom Party6 ward · 2 PR8
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party6 ward · 2 PR8
- African National Congress2 ward · 3 PR5
- Democratic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
- National Peoples Ambassadors1 ward · 1 PR2
- African People's Movement0 ward · 2 PR2
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in Okhahlamba ?
Reported in the ESP app
2016 Ward 13, Okhahlamba in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 15
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 2 621 · All 92 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 92 voting districts here (38 257 of 68 749). The IEC publishes 55.9%.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3333); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 825 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2429); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1099 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1074); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (922); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (875); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 842 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2510); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 698 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1428); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (505); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1857); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 555 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1825); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 582 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1738); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 719 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2183); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1733); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2671); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1897); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2484); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1791); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 922 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2745); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1407); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (947); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 644 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2008); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 616 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1768); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 514 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1531); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 672 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2022); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1921); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (865); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1611); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1040); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (954); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3799); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1415); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (890); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2148: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1542: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 14:39 SAST.