Ulundi

Get the app
Ward 1: IFP 78.5%Ward 2: IFP 73.6%Ward 3: IFP 75.7%Ward 5: IFP 76.9%Ward 6: IFP 86.6%Ward 7: IFP 87.0%Ward 8: IFP 83.0%Ward 9: IFP 85.4%Ward 10: IFP 71.6%Ward 11: IFP 81.7%Ward 12: IFP 73.7%Ward 13: IFP 40.5%Ward 14: IFP 68.2%Ward 15: IFP 79.3%Ward 16: IFP 69.6%Ward 17: IFP 73.3%Ward 18: IFP 70.4%Ward 19: IFP 60.0%Ward 20: IFP 77.9%Ward 21: IFP 59.9%Ward 22: IFP 66.2%Ward 23: IFP 55.9%Ward 24: IFP 76.1%Ward 25: IFP 55.0%Ward 4: IFP 83.4%
WardsIFP 25darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2006 Ward 4 (2006 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

IFP majority

36 of 49 seats

Most ward votes: IFP 72.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

UlundiAll 151 voting districts in
All 25 wards complete
Turnout47.1%
Voters on the roll104k
South Africa · Counting23 623 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.7%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 48 441 valid votes

Council seats · 49 ?

  1. Inkatha Freedom Party25 ward · 11 PR36
  2. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 5 PR5
  3. African National Congress0 ward · 3 PR3
  4. National Freedom Party0 ward · 2 PR2
  5. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
  6. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
  7. National Peoples Ambassadors0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Ulundi ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power25hours off3 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 8 hours offAug: 8 hours off8AugSep · Power: 17 hours offSep: 17 hours off17SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2006 Ward 4 in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 25

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 105 · All 151 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 151 voting districts here (48 881 of 103 674). The IEC publishes 47.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1454 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1803 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (893); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1535 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4995); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1089 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1020); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1513 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4038); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (844); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1627 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1036 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:23 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it