No majority
MKP 14 of 39 seats · 20 for a majority
Most ward votes: MKP 34.9%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 62 775 valid votes
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party21 93434.9%
ANCAfrican National Congress18 15928.9%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party16 36226.1%- SDPService Delivery Party1 0381.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters9461.5%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party7771.2%
DADemocratic Alliance6821.1%- NACOLNational Community Liberation5800.9%
- JCJozini Congress4490.7%
- MAWUSAMawusa Movement Party3680.6%
- SACPSouth African Communist Party3500.6%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2120.3%
- AEFAfrican Economic Freedom1710.3%
NFPNational Freedom Party1550.2%- PPFPeople’s Power Freedom Party1060.2%
- GJDPGods Justice and Development Party1030.2%
- ABMMAbahlali Base Mkhanyakude Movement980.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement760.1%
PFPPeople's Freedom Party710.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania700.1%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party680.1%
Council seats · 39 ?
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party10 ward · 4 PR14
- African National Congress4 ward · 7 PR11
- Inkatha Freedom Party6 ward · 4 PR10
- African Christian Democratic Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
- Service Delivery Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in uMhlabuyalingana ?
Reported in the ESP app
2016 Ward 2, Umhlabuyalingana in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 20
- Ward 1MKP 47.1%
- Ward 2MKP 35.4%
- Ward 3ANC 44.1%
- Ward 4ANC 51.8%
- Ward 5MKP 45.1%
- Ward 6MKP 41.7%
- Ward 7IFP 36.8%
- Ward 8IFP 41.9%
- Ward 9MKP 46.4%
- Ward 10MKP 46.8%
- Ward 11MKP 52.6%
- Ward 12MKP 43.0%
- Ward 13IFP 42.1%
- Ward 14IFP 36.0%
- Ward 15IFP 40.9%
- Ward 16IFP 35.8%
- Ward 17MKP 45.3%
- Ward 18ANC 42.1%
- Ward 19ANC 33.3%
- Ward 20MKP 35.3%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 6 206 · All 96 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 96 voting districts here (63 874 of 103 517). The IEC publishes 61.9%.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1556 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 800 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1764); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3770); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3778); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 919 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2709); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5301); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3700); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 972 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3005); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5358); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4044); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (697); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3587); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 992 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2916); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (976); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3819); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1022 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3049); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1514); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1077 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 897 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2665); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 781 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2310); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3452); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2795); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1378); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2696); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2049); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4468); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1045); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5880); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2262); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1099); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4745); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4223); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1057); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4016); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 932 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2790); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (425); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3343); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 903 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2726); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1709); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3755); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 859 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2625); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1944); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2602); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2455); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1649); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2903); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1524); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3673); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 760 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2281); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 633 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1889); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 855 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2615); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2379); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1141); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2991); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1484); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (488); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1588: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2124: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1381: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:23 SAST.