WardsDA 10ANC 2MKP 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2011 Ward 4 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA majority

15 of 25 seats

Most ward votes: DA 59.7%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

uMngeniAll 46 voting districts in

All 13 wards complete

Turnout64.9%

Voters on the roll61 597

South Africa · Counting23 621 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.7%)

checked 19:29Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 39 583 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance23 62259.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party7 56919.1%
ANCAfrican National Congress6 61516.7%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party4831.2%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4311.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3440.9%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party820.2%
ACCActive Citizens Coalition710.2%
NGGNext Generation Government680.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party670.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement450.1%
ACAfrican Mantungwa Community330.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement290.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah280.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania270.1%
INDIndependent Councillors230.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement180.0%
JEPJustice and Employment Party160.0%
B.M.Bumbana Mzansi90.0%
TRUTHTruth and Solidarity Movement30.0%

Council seats · 25 ?

Democratic Alliance10 ward · 5 PR15
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party1 ward · 4 PR5
African National Congress2 ward · 2 PR4
Inkatha Freedom Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in uMngeni ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power806hours off85 outages

Water114hours off13 outages

Internet27hours off3 outages

2011 Ward 4, uMngeni in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 13

On EskomSePush

uMngeniPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 914 · All 46 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 46 voting districts here (39 984 of 61 597). The IEC publishes 65.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1574 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5060); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10091); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4047); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 944 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 555 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1951); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (727); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1036 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3067); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1011 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 998: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 14:39 SAST.