WardsANC 6MKP 5darker = bigger win

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

MKP 8 of 21 seats · 11 for a majority

Most ward votes: MKP 34.8%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

uMuziwabantuAll 59 voting districts in

All 11 wards complete

Turnout51.1%

Voters on the roll52 138

South Africa · Counting22 349 of 23 696 voting districts in (94.3%)

checked 20:43Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 26 170 valid votes

MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party9 11634.8%
ANCAfrican National Congress8 85733.8%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party5 28220.2%
DADemocratic Alliance8553.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters6922.6%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah3061.2%
IndependentIndependent candidates2080.8%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1860.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1660.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1630.6%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement1280.5%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania840.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance740.3%
PFPPeople's Freedom Party480.2%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity50.0%

Council seats · 21 ?

Umkhonto Wesizwe Party5 ward · 3 PR8
African National Congress6 ward · 1 PR7
Inkatha Freedom Party0 ward · 4 PR4
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in uMuziwabantu ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 11

On EskomSePush

uMuziwabantuPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 801 · All 59 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 59 voting districts here (26 618 of 52 138). The IEC publishes 51.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 957 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2892); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1911); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 789 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1982); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 968 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (951); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 943 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 612 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1016 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3062); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1010 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3024); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 908 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (914); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 19:40 SAST.