uMvoti

Get the app
Ward 1: IFP 40.9%Ward 3: IFP 38.7%Ward 5: ANC 53.9%Ward 6: MKP 41.4%Ward 7: MKP 56.2%Ward 8: IFP 58.7%Ward 9: MKP 29.2%Ward 10: DA 33.8%Ward 11: IFP 40.9%Ward 12: ANC 36.3%Ward 14: IFP 35.4%Ward 2: IFP 35.4%Ward 4: IFP 60.7%Ward 13: IFP 46.3%
WardsIFP 8MKP 3ANC 2DA 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 8 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

IFP 9 of 27 seats · 14 for a majority

Most ward votes: IFP 33.9%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

uMvotiAll 94 voting districts in
All 14 wards complete
Turnout56.4%
Voters on the roll65 647
South Africa · Counting23 474 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.1%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 36 517 valid votes

Council seats · 27 ?

  1. Inkatha Freedom Party8 ward · 1 PR9
  2. African National Congress2 ward · 6 PR8
  3. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party3 ward · 5 PR8
  4. Democratic Alliance1 ward · 0 PR1
  5. Abantu Batho Congress0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in uMvoti ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power35hours off4 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun · Power: 6 hours offJun: 6 hours off6JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 9 hours offAug: 9 hours off9AugSep · Power: 12 hours offSep: 12 hours off12SepOct · Power: 8 hours offOct: 8 hours off8Oct

2000 Ward 8, Umvoti in 2026 ?

Wards · 14

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 962 · All 94 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 94 voting districts here (37 016 of 65 647). The IEC publishes 56.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 787 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 717 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2021); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 914 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 851 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1661); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4038); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 654 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1815 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1093 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 592 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 676 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1993); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (955); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 284: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3941); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 677 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1989); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 952 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 894 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1086 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1022 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 871 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it