uMzimkhulu

special votes 6 171 · All 162 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 162 voting districts here (51 920 of 98 126). The IEC publishes 53.0%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1019 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 989 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 835 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2714); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 532 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 975 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 987 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 925 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 653 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1937); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 740 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 971 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 607 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 979 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2945); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1514 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 986 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 982 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3938); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 833 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 487 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 847 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 574 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1722); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1022 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.