uMzumbe

Get the app
Ward 1: IFP 31.8%Ward 2: IFP 40.6%Ward 4: IFP 51.5%Ward 5: IFP 36.6%Ward 6: MKP 39.1%Ward 7: IFP 35.6%Ward 8: ANC 37.1%Ward 9: IFP 43.1%Ward 10: ANC 58.8%Ward 11: MKP 42.3%Ward 12: IFP 34.8%Ward 13: IFP 56.2%Ward 14: IFP 49.1%Ward 15: IFP 45.1%Ward 16: IFP 36.8%Ward 17: IFP 73.8%Ward 18: IFP 56.0%Ward 19: IFP 46.2%Ward 20: IFP 42.9%Ward 3: IFP 49.3%
WardsIFP 16MKP 2ANC 2darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2006 Ward 4 (2006 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

IFP 16 of 39 seats · 20 for a majority

Most ward votes: IFP 41.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

uMzumbeAll 111 voting districts in
All 20 wards complete
Turnout54.2%
Voters on the roll84 631
South Africa · Counting23 654 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.8%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 45 217 valid votes

Council seats · 39 ?

  1. Inkatha Freedom Party16 ward · 0 PR16
  2. African National Congress2 ward · 9 PR11
  3. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party2 ward · 8 PR10
  4. National Freedom Party0 ward · 1 PR1
  5. African Transformation Movement0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in uMzumbe ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power176hours off17 outages
Water24hours off2 outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun · Power: 6 hours offJun · Water: 15 hours offJun: 21 hours off21JunJul · Power: 64 hours offJul: 64 hours off64JulAug · Power: 42 hours offAug: 42 hours off42AugSep · Power: 33 hours offSep: 33 hours off33SepOct · Power: 31 hours offOct · Water: 10 hours offOct: 41 hours off41Oct

2006 Ward 4 in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 20

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 189 · All 111 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 111 voting districts here (45 840 of 84 631). The IEC publishes 54.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 671 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2022); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 911 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2706); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 890 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1033 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 746 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (758); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 630 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 612 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 916 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 820 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1939); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (994); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 658 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 980 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2941); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 761 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 859 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3688); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3872); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 704 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1715); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1838); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 850 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 617 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (920); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4097); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 627 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 915 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 787 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1005); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:18 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it