Bela-Bela

special votes 2 874 · All 35 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 35 voting districts here (18 561 of 36 411). The IEC publishes 51.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 959 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1081 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 621 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1592); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 347 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1075); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 704 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 863 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.